Matter under stay by the High Court. See Or 21 R22 Proviso. We were subsequently informed by the Defence Ministry that it had not been possible for the expert cell to work out formulations acceptable to the three services on the one hand and Ministry of Defence and Defence Finance on the other. Examination of judgment-debtor as to his property. Warrant for arrest to direct judgment-debtor to be brought up.
These appeals are consequently dismissed with costs, which we quantify as Rs. In cases where the defendant resides outside the jurisdiction of the court where the suit is filed, such court can direct service of summons through any one of the courier services approved by it. But, there are definitive limits to the exercise of the power of review. At the time of filing of the plaint, the trial court should prepare complete schedule and fix dates for all the stages of the suit, right from filing of the written statement till pronouncement of judgment and the courts should strictly adhere to the said dates and the said time table as far as possible. Proclamation of sales by public auction.
If in a given case, ex parte injunction is granted, then the said application for grant of injunction should be disposed of on merits, after hearing both sides as expeditiously as may be possible on a priority basis and undue adjournments should be avoided. Defaulting purchaser answerable for loss on re-sale. The introduction of evidences via affidavits as well as the introduction of the court appointed commissioner will also further this objective. He filed another suit No. Looking to the importance of the matter we requested Dr.
Instances are there that the decree holder also colludes with the J. Similarly, the other issues concerning limitation, maintainability and Court fee could always be treated as preliminary issues as no detail evidence is required to be led. It further relates to disposal of the suit treating these points as preliminary issues and also relates to deferring the settlement of other issues. Explanation : The fact that the decision on question of law on which the judgment of the court is based has been reversed or modified by the subsequent decision of a superior court in any other case, shall not be a ground for the review of such judgment. In that case, it has been reiterated that an error apparent on the face of the record for acquiring jurisdiction to review must be such an error which may strike one on a mere looking at the record and would not require any long drawn process of reasoning. But, the order dated 23. Regarding the introduction of additional.
It pertains to court fees and jurisdiction. Appellant filed Title Suit No. The entire evidence has been led, the matter is at the stage of final arguments and the point raised does not relate to the point pertaining to Sub Rule 2. During pendency of this suit, the owner executed a sale deed in favour of respondent. In the suit, on 6. The plaintiff closed his evidence on February 15, 1992, keeping his right to produce evidence in rebuttal and April 9, 1992 was fixed for defendant's evidence.
Where the order in question is appealable the aggrieved party has adequate and efficacious remedy and the Court should exercise the power to review its order with the greatest circumspection. The final decision of the court regarding this claim i. Court may grant time and adjourn hearing- 1 The Court may, if sufficient cause is shown, at any stage of the suit grant time to the parties or to any of them, and may from time to time adjourn the hearing of the suit for reasons to be recorded in writing. After dismissal of the suit, the defendant filed petition under Order 9 Rule 13 read with Section 151 of C. After hearing all the arguments, the court will rule in the favor of either A or B. The ground of illness, which had been taken for such adjournment, was though quite substantial but the gravity of the same has been out-weighed by the trial court simply keeping in view the referred proviso to Rule 1 of Order 17 C.
Procedure where Court desires that its own decree shall be executed by another Court. Those involved receive less than full justice and there are many more in the country, in fact, a greater number than those involved who suffer injustice because they have little access to justice, in fact, lack of awareness and confidence in the justice system. He was also granted time to bring stay order from the Court in revisions to be filed against the orders passed on the said applications. The parties are entitled to be impleaded when execution proceedings are pending. Order 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure deals with the provision of adjournment. According to the learned Amicus Curiae, the practice of mechanically framing the issues needs to be discouraged.
Subsequent thereto the very next day 31. On different dates he was cross-examined in parts because of petitions for adjournment filed by the defendant from time to time. Disallowance of claim to property attached. Under the amended provision, when a party files a Civil Revision Petition aggrieved by the Order of a lower Court, the High Court cannot reverse such Order except where the Order, if it had been made in favour of the Revisioner, would have had the effect of finally disposing of the proceedings. In such a case, there is no restriction on number of adjournments to be granted.
Against that order, Civil Miscellaneous Main 1490 of 2005 was filed in the Delhi High Court. As per the amendment, the defendant now has 60 days as opposed to the earlier 30 days for depositing the suit money in court. Rights and liabilities of parties to a dispute. It is happening because it is the general impression that even if ultimately unauthorized person is thrown out of the premises the court would not ordinarily punish the unauthorized person by awarding realistic and actual mesne profits, imposing costs or ordering prosecution. The appellants argued that Issue Number 4 would also be determined along with other issues. The appellant preferred Second Appeal No.
The main question which arises for our consideration is whether the prevailing delay in civil litigation can be curbed?. In any order issued pursuant to this section, such agency shall be directed to make a progress report to the court, the parties and the child's law guardian on the implementation of such order, no later than ninety days after the issuance of such order, unless the court determines that the facts and circumstances of the case do not require such reports to be made. Mohan, in our legal system, uncalled for litigation gets encouragement because our courts do not impose realistic costs. The High Court has also dealt with number of judgments dealing with the power of the High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution. On the date fixed, the judgment was pronounced decreeing the suit bearing C. The court committed grave error of law by its order to forfeit the right of the defendant to cross-examine the plaintiff. No documents were exhibited on behalf of any of the parties.